|   |
| National
|
US
U.S. theories may not have global application |
| Political
|
Limitations |
| Organizational
|
Theory X & Y
Leadership and management styles vary according to assumptions about human nature |
| Cultural Change
|
Ambivalent Leadeship
Produced by a culture with contradictory norms and values |
| Europe | – Labor relations political
– Based on greater social class distinctions between workers and management or ownership than in U.S. – Government takes more direct role in regulating labor and management and in responsibility for worker social security concerns – Because of long history of unions, higher degree of acceptance and integration of them into the economy than in the U. S. |
| Japan | Firm organizes and usually controls union
– Unions responsible in negotiations, abide by their contracts, strikes quite rare |
| South America
|
– Close relationship between unions and government
– Many rights and benefits for workers codified in law |
| PM Leadership Theory
• Developed in Japan • P - performance function • M - maintenance function • Effective leader emphasizes both functions • Leadership functions in different ways from situation to situation – Elements of culture in which leadership takes place – Specific contexts within a culture |
NT Leadership Theory
• Developed in India • Two dimensions of effective leader behavior – Nurturance (N) – Task (T) • Preferred leadership style provides Nurturant and Task behaviors simultaneously |
| Weber’s Theory of Leadership
Authority: Traditional |
Leadership and Ethics
|
Transformational Leadership
|
Leadership and Meaning
|
| Rational
|
|||
| Charismatic
|
| Overseas Chinese Leadership
|
French Admin Leadership
|
| • Legitimacy of leader derives from patrimonial loyalty
• Variation in Mainland Chinese leadership ranges from managerial practices based on traditional values, continuation of key elements of communist industrial system, and modern capitalist management • Overseas Chinese leadership style continues tradition of patriarchy |
• Unequal distribution of power and centralized decision making
• Consistent with bureaucratic rationality • French organizations have more levels of hierarchy, more lateral segmentation into departments and work groups • Many French companies paternalistic, hierarchical, but French multinational corporations increasingly decentralizing |
| Transformational/charismatic | Hofstede: Uncertainty avoidance |
| Team oriented | Power distance |
| Self protective | Societal Collectivism |
| Participative | In group collectivism |
| Autonimous | Gender egalitarianism |
| Assertiveness | |
| Kluckholm & Strodtbeck’s Future Orient- | |
| McClelland’s Need for achievement | |
| Need for humane orientation |